Feminism is female entitlement syndrome applied to state policy. Every other nation or society that has fallen to feminist bullshit has reserved ample amounts of cash for indulging the female of the species. Every other media house beats itself in descent to intellectual absurdity to achieve the noble act to highlighting the “inherent angelic” nature of the woman.
India, the land of brainless elite and pampered lower classes had one more point to add to the list. It is the Indian woman. She enjoys a great privilege, both in social and private life. The state of india, already gobbled up by shit-headed feminazis, allocates enormous wealth for welfare of the female. Let me list some of those numb-headed initiatives taken up by the Governement of India
- 33% of openings in engineering and medical colleges reserved to the fairer sex.
- 50% of seats in local governing bodies reserved to women
- Proposal to reserve 33% of seats in National Parliament and State assemblies to women. Unfortunately this has received the approval from Upper house of our parliament.
- Waivers in tution fee for women attending professional colleges in few states
- Easy Public loans to women’s groups of rural india
- Dedicated seating arrangements for women in public transport vehicles.(Bus, Train etc.,)
- A shit-headed education system that rewards the female ideals of conformance and rote by memory.
If my fellow desi brothers have more content to add, please quote it in the comments section. I would include that as well.

35 comments
Comments feed for this article
June 24, 2010 at 3:26 pm
Bhalle Bhalle
I’ve been to India, and as a woman, it’s not a place I would ever want to be born and forced to live my entire life.
I mean, the women there are expected to live with their in-laws and act as their un-paid maids, cooks and care-givers.
What to speak of not being paid for that service, THEY are expected to PAY TO DO IT – in the form of a dowry.
Unpaid slavery is one thing – but when they slave PAYS to be a slave…
…what they hell kind of a system is that?
July 18, 2010 at 4:13 am
Desi Aadmi
Naturally, your ignorance stinks up to a proverbial mile.
I have replied and defeated many such arguments from countless dumb-headed women. You are obviously one of them.
August 21, 2010 at 6:30 pm
Rohan
and men are treated as unpaid body guards and protectors and providers of women….men are treated as unpaid ATM machines.
August 30, 2010 at 7:04 pm
Rohan
Shocking Statistics
Official Statistics (Source: NCRB)
Males Females
Suicide of MARRIED
persons (2005-2008) 2,23,167 1,18,345
SUICIDE Rate (Married) 65.35% 34.65%
One SUICIDE in Every 9.42 Mins 17.77 Mins
Number of MURDERS 26467 7952
One Murder in Every 19Mins 66Mins
No of 498a cases in 2006-2008 by N/A 1,39,058
One Married Man Commits Suicide every 9 Mins!
IS INDIA A SAFE PLACE FOR MEN????
June 27, 2010 at 4:02 am
Weekend Link Fest – Summer is here edition « Seasons of Tumult and Discord
[...] Desi Adami: Indian Woman: A Creature Pampered by State [...]
June 27, 2010 at 5:24 pm
Linkage is Good for You: Best Foot Forward Edition (NSFW)
[...] Desi Aadmi – “Indian Woman: A Creature Pampered by State” [...]
June 28, 2010 at 5:16 pm
Bharatiya Nari
“India, the land of brainless elite and pampered lower classes had one more point to add to the list. It is the Indian woman. She enjoys a great privilege, both in social and private life. ”
You’re joking right?
I’ve been all over the world and the condition for women in India is one of the worst I’ve ever seen anywhere. We can’t even walk down the street without getting sexually harrassed, what you call “eve-teasing”.
And don’t even get me started on this whole dowry and living with in-laws craziness!
July 18, 2010 at 4:15 am
Desi Aadmi
if YOU dress to attract male attention then you are deservedly a target of eve-teasing.
BTW…the gina of you women tingles at those bad boy’s. Are you in a bout of pointless self denial?
August 21, 2010 at 6:32 pm
Rohan
The urban educated women use rural uneducated women as proxies to get undue advantages and to dominate men. Female victimhood is your religion and feminazism is God.
August 24, 2010 at 8:02 pm
Rohan
marriage fraud 1: marry a guy, defame him, leave him, and file a false dowry case against him and his parents. get a lot of money as settlement and alimony.
marriage fraud 2: go to courts to get married. don’t marry but file a false dowry case against him and his parents. get a lot of money.
7-year old faces dowry charges
http://www.ndtv.com/convergence/ndtv/story.aspx?id=NEWEN20070013361
March 2, 2011 at 4:53 am
MCP
A lot of women are delusional about their looks and feel every man is gazing in their direction or having a wet dream looking at them….you seem to be one of them.
July 25, 2010 at 11:10 pm
TFH
And don’t even get me started on this whole dowry and living with in-laws craziness!
If you had to compete in the American dating market (against white women better looking + more sexually eager than you), you would stand no chance. You would be single and lonely for the rest of your days.
Get a clue.
August 2, 2010 at 7:27 pm
Desi Aadmi
Yep…desi chicks are delusional and idiotic…
July 25, 2010 at 11:12 pm
TFH
Desi Aadmi,
Please see The Misandry Bubble.
August 2, 2010 at 7:26 pm
Desi Aadmi
TFH,
Again that’s a masterful essay from you. I read that some gazillion times. In fact the quality of that post is similiar to that of an academic paper….
August 3, 2010 at 3:00 am
The Fifth Horseman
Thanks!
July 31, 2010 at 4:00 am
Sita Ram Bai
Desi Admi,
I think you were rude to the above commenters and you failed to address their points. Perhaps you would also like to describe what you feel is “dressing to attract male attention”. I have no desire to attract the attention of any man in India and yet I, my sisters, my aunties, my mother and for fuck’s sake – even my grandmother – was harrassed there. None of us were dressed to attract ANY attention, we were dressed just like the locals, blending in seemlessly.
Can you explain that please?
And you did not address the point of dowry and having to work as a unpaid maid in the home of in-laws.
Ever hear of the movie “NO COUNTRY FOR OLD MEN”?
India is “NO COUNTRY FOR OLD OR YOUNG WOMEN”.
I just don’t understand why Indian men like you are angry. Indian women are amongst the most compliant women on the planet – can you name any other country where a bride actually AGREES to live with her in-laws (besides Pakistan and Bangladesh?)
Nowhere in the world will you find a wife agreeing to this outside of India a few other countries.
There are many good things about India (as anywhere), but as a woman who has travelled the world – I am most bothered there, no matter what I wear or what I do.
If, by blending in with the locals I am still harrassed, why should I bother to blend in at all?
This is not only a complaint of local Indian women, of NRIs who travel there to visit family, but of foreign tourist women as well – including all those visiting India for yoga or spirituality. These women are NOT looking to “attract male attention”.
Please describe the type of dress you feel is “purposely attracting male attention”. A sari? A salwar kameez? A long skirt to the ankle? A long skirt to the knee? What? Because NO MATTER WHAT I WORE in India – I still got ILLEGAL MALE ATTENTION.
Care to explain? (I even had to go SWIMMING FULLY CLOTHED! And STILL got UNWANTED male attention!)
Care to explain?
Nowhere on the face of Planet Earth have I experience this before.
Care to explain?
Do you or do you not acknowledge that “eve teasing” is a major problem in that country and that it should be dealt with sharply by the legal authorities?
August 2, 2010 at 7:36 pm
Desi Aadmi
Obviously your comment is an extrapolation of personal experience. And modern indian women wear sary with a back-exposing blouse, a punjabi with a very very tight fit, a long skirt with transparent cloth. When you dress to attract attention you are teased, and quite appropriately at that…
August 21, 2010 at 6:16 pm
Rohan
I just don’t understand why Indian men like you are angry. Indian women are amongst the most compliant women on the planet – can you name any other country where a bride actually AGREES to live with her in-laws (besides Pakistan and Bangladesh?)—————————————————————————-I do not have the time to read your reply. But let me answer one small portion that provoked me. Indian men are angry because they have been demonised, criminalised for being chivalrous, for marrying and protecting and providing women and society. Indian women may still live with parents-in-law by and large but that does not imply they are compliant. They squeeze and screw up their partners in all other ways. MEN ARE TREATED AS ATM MACHINES. SUICIDE OF MEN IS 5 TIMES MORE THAN WOMEN. ISN’T THIS OPPRESSION?
August 21, 2010 at 6:34 pm
Rohan
Men Are Oppressed Too!
The oppression of men is an extremely complex phenomenon to understand. It has always been hidden, disguised, indirect, Innumerous, severe, carefully conspired and going on for thousands of years. Above all, it’s carefully and forcibly unacknowledged.
Today, it would be seen as ’startling’ and ‘unbelievable’ at the best and outright ‘ridiculous’ and ’scandalous’ at the worst to talk about man’s oppression. It’s not easy to see even the misery and pain of men, even when it is extreme.
It is so well hidden not only from the world but from the man himself. It’s just not acknowledged. No place for it in the society. No value for a man’s tears. Tears are ‘feminine’. The mechanisms of man’s oppression are just as invisible as his tears.
Once you are sensitized and you learn to look beyond what is ‘obvious’ and you slowly start witnessing it all. The first things that point to the size and nature of these invisible mechanisms are the extraordinary and intense pressures that the society (or rather a section of it) exerts to sustain or strengthen the mechanisms.
The masculinity with which boys are born, is natural masculinity. This is given by nature. However, society has created a mechanism whereby it does not acknowledge this natural masculinity. It has instead created its own version, which we shall call ’social masculinity’.
Social masculinity is not naturally endowed, but has to be granted by society. Society does not accept a person as a ‘man’ unless he fulfills certain preconditions of roles or expectations of society, referred to as ‘male gender and sexual roles’, or ’social masculinity roles.
A person is not considered a man without social manhood. This social mechanism is designed to control male behavior, especially male sexual behavior. The result is silent severe oppression of men.
Some of the “Social Masculinity” Roles are:
1. Men don’t have any emotions. They should suppress their emotions and problems.
2. They are rough and tough and should NOT complain about women.
3. Men are expected to be physically tall, strong, and brave.
4. They are supposed to protect and provide women.
5. They are supposed to make sacrifices, even sacrificing their lives, to protect and provide women.
6. They are not supposed to have weaknesses or vulnerabilities. They must not show feelings as these would make them appear weak or vulnerable.
7. They should always be willing to fight their way and defend their families. They should not return from a fight.
8. They should not have any feelings.
The result is that men are far more prone to heart attacks and stroke. Their life expectancy is some 5-6 years less than women, worldwide. Similarly, the social construct of manhood makes them NOT to complain about women, even if their women are causing them grievous hurt!
Women’s education is subsidized and a lot of support systems exist for them to open shop. While men are paying 82% of taxes in India and are denied any kind of support systems. Yet, it is men who are supposed to provide for women. Every year, 3 times more men commit suicide than women and yet there are no support systems or even laws to protect men.
All this is happening in a society that claims to have dumped the earlier traditional roles and concepts of gender and has women working in all fields and having more constitutional rights than men!
It is high time that men are liberated from their traditional roles and their masculinity is redefined based in natural masculinity and NOT with the kind of contradictions stated above. Men have always been considered as disposable and have been taken for granted.
It is high time men understand that are NOT privileged and have been suppressed too!
July 31, 2010 at 4:02 am
No Tingle!
My gina does NOT tingle for Indian boys.
August 2, 2010 at 7:30 pm
Desi Aadmi
It will for bad boys….
August 1, 2010 at 12:01 am
Sat Sri Akal
In India it doesn’t matter how they dress. The boys to old men will eve-tease them – whether in a burqa or bikini. India is a nation of children.
August 2, 2010 at 6:29 pm
Another Desi Admi
I have to say, as a husband to a woman, son of a woman and the father of three girls who are soon to be women, India is not a place I feel safe or confident about taking them to.
We had considered moving to India some time ago as I was going to join a company there, but after our first initial visit and seeing how neither my wife nor daughters could roam about freely without getting followed and harrassed by strangers, we decided not to.
My daughters are unwilling to even visit India ever again – despite having beloved family there.
I am writing this from my hotel room on the beach as my wife is on the sand playing beach volley ball with a local college group and my daughters are swimming happily in the sea.
Nobody is being followed or harrassed, despite wearing swim-wear.
So obviously they would not want to live in India.
August 2, 2010 at 7:33 pm
Desi Aadmi
First of all you define yourself in relation to women(as husband, father and son to women). Man, you are an individual and do not allow to be defined by their narrow and dumb brains.
And regarding your other comments I have answered them above.
Anyway thanks for stopping by man..
August 3, 2010 at 9:36 pm
Answer the ?s, boys.
You have not addressed the issue of eve-teasing at all. The writers are saying that no matter what they wore, it went on. This is the complaint of Indian women across the country.
Nevertheless, in the US people are half naked on the beach and are not getting harrassed. So are you saying that Indian men are less civilized?
Why so?
What about all of the “sadhus” that roam India with they small penises hanging out for the world to see? Are Indian women following them and grabbing their dicks?
India is a confused place. I sympathize with you having to live there. Get out as soon as you can.
TFH, no where did your response address dowry and living with in-laws. Perhaps you are unaware that even “love marriages” in India often involve dowry and living with in-laws, despite the pair “competing in the sexual marketplace” for each other.
Besides, I’m hearing that Desi kama sutra devis do quite well in the “American sexual market” with White and Black men who find them “exotic”.
August 5, 2010 at 3:41 am
Desi Aadmi
Ok..cool…fools like yourself deserve to be pumped and dumped by black men…
August 30, 2010 at 7:08 pm
Rohan
ADAM TEASING IS ALSO VERY COMMON EXCEPT THAT IT IS NOT ACKNOWLEDGED. MOREOVER, WITH REGARD TO YOUR STATEMENT THAT NO MATTER WHAT THEY WORE, THEY ATTRACTED ATTENTION, DO YOU MEAN TO SAY THAT A WOMAN CAN WALK IN BIKINIS AND NOTHING SHOULD HAPPEN TO HER? RIGHTS COME WITH RESPONSIBILITIES. WOMEN ONLY WANT RIGHTS. THEY NEVER SPEAK ABOUT RESPONSIBILITIES.
August 6, 2010 at 1:12 am
Brown on Black Pyar
Except that most Black men who pump Desi women want to wife us up a.s.a.p.
When will men realize that most women these days don’t want to “settle down” until our 30′s – if at all?
Family is over-rated. Especially kids.
The planet is over-populated, especially by us colored folk.
Indira Gandhi had the right idea with mass sterilization.
August 6, 2010 at 3:44 am
Gulabi Niqabi
Just wondering what you think of this outfit of our respected First Lady, wife of the most powerful man in the world: the President of the United States -
http://news.yahoo.com/s/yblog_upshot/20100805/pl_yblog_upshot/first-lady-under-fire-for-her-glitzy-spanish-vacation
Do you think that she “deserves” to be sexually harrassed for bearing her (gasp!) shoulders?
Or would you rather she globe-trotted in niqab and burqa like a Saudi Arab?
August 21, 2010 at 6:19 pm
Rohan
Do you think that she “deserves” to be sexually harrassed for bearing her (gasp!) shoulders?——————————————————————————-do you think she has the right to dress provocatively and the right to create sexual arousal in men? Rights come with responsibilities. Hen-pecked men cannot have the spine to oppose it.
September 6, 2010 at 6:50 am
Ameridesi
Rohan, different men are turned on by different things. For some men it might be shoulders, for some it might be cleavage, etc. So you suggest that a woman should cover her entire body without a trace of any skin to be seen, including the face, which is by the way, the most attractive thing to most men, ????
So we are to dress like Saudi Darth Vadars just because you might think we are pretty?
India is destined to become like Afghanistan, and when it does, I will be laughing at the men and crying for the women. As well as arranging for those women to migrate to normal, sane, healthy, female-friendly countries.
Men around the world love Indian women – are Devi-like looks and smooth chocolate skin. We have no problem in the internationaly dating scene. The same cannot be said for Desi dudes.
My advice is for every Indian woman to leave India as soon as possible and set up her life in a better country where she can live safely as a single OR have her pick of a wide variety of men who were not spoiled by their mothers like little Desi betas were.
Dudh piyo, beta!
Bharat Mahan!
Indeed…………..
August 21, 2010 at 5:57 pm
Rohan
Misplaced And Skewed Concept Of Equality:-
Over the last 60 years many policies have been instituted in the country in the name of women’s liberation and empowerment. Special laws have been passed specifically in the name of women’s protection such as IPC Section 498A (law against marital cruelty and dowry harassment) and Domestic Violence Law.
Unfortunately, there are no safeguards to prevent misuse of these protective provisions. These “women-protection laws”, which are in essence wife-protection laws, assume that wives are always honest victims and would never jeopardize their own family life by making false claims of abuse. The draconian law, IPC Section 498A, in particular, allows the arrest of the husband and his male and female relatives, irrespective of their age, martial status or even health condition, solely on the basis of allegations of a wife, without any evidence or investigation.
Owing to this blind assumption and due to the absence of inherent checks and balances to prevent misuse of the laws, many innocent mothers-in-law, sisters-in-law and other female relatives of husbands are arrested and harassed through long-drawn trials that last several years. Several authorities have noted that in close to 98% of cases filed under Section 498A, the accusations are false and that the complaints were only filed with ulterior motives. Nevertheless, minor girls, pregnant women, married and unmarried sisters, ailing mothers and even aged grandmothers have been sent behind bars and prosecuted based on mere allegations.
Young mothers are either torn away from their children or imprisoned along with them leaving indelible scars on the minds of the mothers and the children. Many mothers and sisters are heart-broken to see their sons and brothers lose their youth, their health, their jobs, all their earnings, and sometimes even their lives, as they are mercilessly tortured by their estranged wives, aided by lawyers, police and the judiciary. Some women have ended their lives unable to bear the humiliation of being accused and arrested, and the trauma of making endless trips around the courts.
Noted activist Madhu Kishwar acknowledged that IPC Section 498A is heavily misused, and that a significant proportion of individuals who approach “Manushi” these days are mothers-in-law and husbands who are falsely accused. Renowned IPS officer Kiran Bedi admitted that many poor and illiterate mothers-in-law and sisters-in-law, who are falsely charged under IPC Section 498A are languishing in prison every year. The Supreme Court of India has labeled the misuse of IPC Section 498A as “legal terrorism”. The Delhi High Court recently stated that IPC Section 498A is the most abused provision. The World Health Organization, in its report on India clearly cited Section 498A as one of the major reasons for the “Increasing Abuse of the Elderly in India”. Recently, the National Human Rights Commission noted that the Tihar jail is overflowing with people falsely accused under dowry cases. A look at the crime records shows that every 20 minutes an innocent woman is arrested under IPC Section 498A. In addition to penalizing innocent women, a large backlog of false cases in our highly corrupt and inefficient legal system prevents genuine victims of abuse from obtaining justice. Through IPC Section 498A the police and the legal fraternity are protecting those women who indulge in perjury, blackmail, extortion and harassment of their husbands and in-laws. Despite having such compelling evidence that more harm than good is being done to women through IPC Section 498A, none of the leading women’s organizations, law makers nor the Ministry for Women and Child Welfare have taken any measures to arrest misuse of this law.
All the warnings, requests, recommendations and demands from several quarters to amend IPC Section 498A have fallen on deaf ears. Even before fixing the flaws in IPC Section 498A the Domestic Violence Law was introduced in 2006 with similar loopholes and without public discussion. Misuse of the Domestic Violence law began very soon after its introduction, and under its provisions a number of elderly mothers-in-law have been thrown out of their own homes by their daughters-in-law.
It is customary for women’s organizations to trivialize the extent of misuse of these laws by women and to exaggerate statistics of dowry harassment, dowry death and domestic abuse. It is also customary for women’s rights activists to deny domestic abuse against our fathers, brothers and sons. However, recent data from the National Crime Bureau indicates that nearly twice as many married men, compared to married women, commit suicide every year, unable to withstand verbal, emotional, economic and physical abuse and legal harassment. While every death of a young married woman is converted into a case of dowry death leading to immediate arrest of the husband and in-laws, large-scale suicides of men do not cause any outrage in the society. Is the pain of a mother who lost a son to domestic abuse or legal terrorism any less than that of a mother who lost a daughter? How many more mothers and sisters should lose their sons and brothers before measures are taken to alleviate their sufferings? Aren’t mothers and sisters women? Don’t they deserve a life of dignity and respect? Does penalizing innocent mothers and sisters under false cases bring justice to genuinely abused women? Does women’s empowerment mean destroying family harmony and creating a fatherless society? Is protection of women’s rights synonymous with gross violation of basic human rights? Is legal terrorism the solution to all women’s problems?
September 6, 2010 at 6:43 am
Ameridesi
Rohan, you might be able to fool some stupid Americans on the internet who have never been to India. I’ve been there. As a woman I wouldn’t recommend it to anyone.
My hope for Indian women is that most of them will immigrate out to much more female friendly countries.
February 7, 2011 at 11:07 am
Pravin Kulkarni
We must first understand that all of us whether man or a woman are humans. All commit mistakes and if given a chance they all succumb to lures of money, sex, power etc. That is why misuse of law occurs. Regarding the dressing, I agree that today some women are definitely overstepping their limits. I often wonder why the parents of these girls cannot see what others do?
Personally I will not like my daughter (If I ever have one) or my sister to wear provocatively and people pass comments.
There were some strange comments about not wanting to attract any males. Is that true? Because it is natural to want to attract opposite sex. Unfortunately males in all species have been given the task of taking lead. This is true with humans also. The nature is yet to remove this aggressive gene from men through evolution. When it does I am sure women shall have no complaints. Till then all of us should try to understand the natural phenomena and live as amicably as possible.
Women should not be oppressed goes without saying and neither should women go to other extreme.