Here is an excerpt from Steve Moxon’s seminal anti-feminist work, namely Women’s Racket:
Women, however—even high-flyers like The Apprentice contestants— when pitched into a task-oriented environment may fail to perceive that the outcome is all that matters (rather than the impact of the task on their social network) and so become obsessed by their perceived position—in other words they tend to psychologise something that men see in purely instrumental terms. This explains the paradox that women might superficially appear to be the most status-obsessed sex in the workplace despite men being much more strongly motivated in this regard. Men are not obsessed with status so much as achievement—status naturally following on from success.
This explains the “superiority” of the fairer sex. There have been many idiotic books by manginas and feminazis eulogize the female to be an incarnation of goddess. Apparently, in their own world, women are creatures blessed with a ton of kindness and empathy. This lie has propagated itself in the media, on the TV and with in some idiotic print literature.
Folks, listen to this hard truth, listen to it before you face a rude awakening in the workplace or in your private life:
Women are the most undemocratic and dictatorial creatures
Every female politician, every woman that claimed to have achieved the pinnacle by her own “hard work” has always been narrow minded and narcissistic. There have been numerous examples in the history and around us. In this post, I would present you the curious case of Mayawati, India’s notorious dalit politician.
As all we know , almost all of the female politicians are parasites that leech of her husband’s or father’s popularity. And the woman leaders that claim to “grow from bottom” are unabashed examples of “She-Males” with manly jaw line and angular facial features. A cursory look at mayawati’s visage would confirm you this.
As often said, women are the most narcissistic creatures on this planet. In their small and narrow world, she yearns that all the things of import should revolve around her unstable emotions. In housewives this quality is exhibited as their un-ending rants of jealousy and contempt for her husband’s family. In working women this is glaringly seen as their obsession for cosmetics and clothing. In older women this “noble” trait is the result of her jealousy towards daughter in law.
Naturally, female leaders are not free from their inborn, innate charactertistic. This manifests as her dictatorial attitude and obsessive interest at glorifying her rule. This self-centered steak resounds of truth, whenever she throws emotional and illogical tantrums at political rivals. Hereby I humbly present the case of Mayawati, and her escapades at wasting tax payer’s money.
- She was obsessive at building public parks full of her statues, the “investment” in this glorification activity wasting around $400 million, when india desperately needs roads and power plants. She justified this activity as a social “necessity”.
- Her birthday’s are an grand gala events, with each one putting the tax payer by several million dollars. That “sacred” days is often declared as Special an Kalyankari Diwas
A symbolic cake would be cut in all the 403 assembly constituencies where BSP workers would inform people about the achievements of the Mayawati government. Cassettes and CDs of the achievements of the government would also be distributed free of cost.
A 52-kg cake would be cut in the Lucknow (east) constituency followed by a community feast. However, entire Lucknow has been decorated with each and every important place of the party including Prerna Kendra, Ambedkar Memorial, Chief Minister’s residence and BSP office.
- She revels in garlands filled with rupee notes and the total value of the garland amounting to Rs.21 Lakhs
I dare say that no male politician would be so vain to build his own statue park and spend crores of cash on brithday bashes. Feminazis and feminist wimps may vehemently disagree by pointing at dastardly deeds of male politicians. I never discounted the fallibility of male politicians. But the tales of stupidity by female leaders are smack in the face for all the female supremacists.
10 comments
Comments feed for this article
March 25, 2010 at 1:47 am
krunal shimpi
hey, i donno how to link yours as it’s in wordpress. do u want me to add urs to the blogs i follow.
besides i have found that u bring a lot of gud and factual stuff about feminism and some conspiracy played by women. but see some of urs happened to be against women. that is not gud. i understand how u r feeling. i have been there. i have been on one end of the spectrum (being kindo male-feminist in my school time) to another end (sort of turning into misogynist) and eventually finding balance somewhere in the middle. i dont think all women are bad. there are independant and wonderful women out there who are equally concerned about men’s issues. (visit http://www.equalbutdifferent.blogspot.com). i am just against the femiNAZIs.
so i would request you not to make some generalisation about women,
(yes but we should bring out the wrongdoings instigated by women in order to prove that women can be (and are) as bad as men, just the form of being bad are (slightly) different.
March 25, 2010 at 9:56 pm
six4669201
Kunal,
Thanks for the comment.
When I speak of women, I speak purely on behalf of scientific paradigm. Often this view matches with most of the woman. There are good ones as Kim(at equalbutdifferent.blogspot.com), but she is an exception to the rule.
March 28, 2010 at 4:38 am
desi
What about your Ma? Desi men are usually head over heals in love with Ma. Is your Ma an angular faced feminazi bitch too? Or is she an exception to the rule like Kim?
What do her bahus think?
August 24, 2010 at 2:02 pm
Neo
Well, I completely disagree with you for this blog. I am a completely against feminism however there has to be a clear definition of that. You may be really pissed off because of some incident that must have happened with you and then you realised the disease of female cleverness. However, scientifically you cannot justify every women out there falls into this category. There is a breed growing I agreee but there clearly is a line to differentiate the feminist bitches. You have to agree that there are many roles a women play in a family and a women can be your mother, sister, sister in law, daugter etc. If you try to see them from a single veiw that all are bad and they should be condemned then someone has brainwashed you or you need some guidance. Even though you say that all womens in west have become nuisance, then too, it would be completely false. You see there cant be a generalization. There are womens who hate men and they really hate men and then they give speeches, quotes and try to get other womens along with them. Still there are major part left who still love their family, values and morality.
. I just hate them… However, there are many who still give importance to their families as much as to work. So I dont generalise women, I just find the rats. Once I find these rats, I make sure that everyone man in my office is aware of this bitch. They are few, but they are growing very fast and many men get fooled by their manipulations.
The definition of this new species according to me can as simple as “A women who does not understand the responsibilities of family, has got superiority complex due to her beauty,wealth,position or education, is very manipulative to get things done her way, does not understand her duties in the society and doesnt respect her man should be termed as the most dangerous rats on earth”
We find a lot of these in our offices and many of them being our colleagues
Everything being said, still I feel that there are cases when a women does all this to accomplish something. May be she wants to take revenge on someone and has to do all the tricks in the game. May be she is fighting for her family or her community people. She may use many tricks which not everyone who is not related will understand. Its between her and the opposition. There is nothing that she is doing bad to her family or colleagues but has a differnt motive. Although this possibility is very very very less, I can assure you that it holds true in case of Mayawati. All of this X generation does not a bit of history, present and politics and are influenced by media, rumours and articles without going deep inside the material and knowing what and why exactly are the things happening. Discriminating against someone because of her looks is the most hypocritical thing to do. Why Mayawati looks like a village girl, not attractive face and no good appearance can be found out by reading the history of dalits in India. Regarding Mayawati, if you have little knowledge of the war she is fighting against the elites then you would understand the building of the monuments,celebration of birthdays and accepting garlands. Just to let you know, Indira was a dictator but is she not on your hit list because of her looks or family background? Do you question why all monuments, bridges, schemes all over India are named after only one family. No one else has a right? Mayawati has just gone one step ahead. Did you know how various parties get funds for their operation? Is there any clearity? Do you know within few days after Mayawati wearing garland was highlighted on TV’s, BSP came out with photograph of Sonia gandhi wearing cash garland. Did you see the news anywhere? It was printed in papers but not argued upon. Infact all this hue and cry was subdued.
http://economictimes.indiatimes.com/articleshow/5724629.cms
So my dear friend, lets start a blog to define the rats and then share our experience, discuss stories and spread awareness. Till then writing anything and everything about anyone would help you just to loose your idea mates. I hope to hear something very sensible from you on this else it would just be a bye bye to an extremist.
August 30, 2010 at 7:33 pm
Rohan
Feminism in the guise of liberty for women has destroyed social and cultural fabric of Europe, United States, Russia and other developed countries. In Islamic and oriental societies, women performed a critical function of stabilizing the basic unit of society called family. Women are the crown of creation. Feminism stripped them of all the crowing glory that God bestowed upon them.
The ultimate goal of feminism has been stated very clear – to attack the root of society, that is, the family and destroy it! Below are extracts of statements by well-known feminists.
THE PLANNED DESTRUCTION OF THE FAMILY BY FEMINISTS
“Destroy the family,” as Lenin said, “and you destroy society.” Thereby he merely repeated what Socrates had said before and what Friedrich Engels and Karl Marx put into words. Lenin set out to do just that, hoping that a new society — with the State as the ultimate father — could be constructed.
“How will the family unit be destroyed? … the demand alone will throw the whole ideology of the family into question, so that women can begin establishing a community of work with each other and we can fight collectively. Women will feel freer to leave their husbands and become economically independent, either through a job or welfare.”
— Female Liberation, by Roxanne Dunbar.
“The nuclear family must be destroyed, and people must find better ways of living together. … Whatever its ultimate meaning, the break-up of families now is an objectively revolutionary process. … “Families have supported oppression by separating people into small, isolated units, unable to join together to fight for common interests. …
— Functions of the Family, Linda Gordon, WOMEN: A Journal of Liberation, Fall, 1969.
“Feminists have long criticized marriage as a place of oppression, danger, and drudgery for women.”
— Is Marriage the Answer? by Barbara Findlen, Ms magazine, May-June, 1995
“[The nuclear family is] a cornerstone of woman’s oppression: it enforces women’s dependence on men, it enforces heterosexuality and it imposes the prevailing masculine and feminine character structures on the next generation.” — Alison Jagger, Feminist Politics and Human Nature
“The first class opposition that appears in history coincides with the development of the antagonism between man and woman in monogamous marriage, and the first class oppression coincides with that of the female sex by the male.”
— Frederick Engels, The Origins of the Family, Private Property and the State (New York, International Publishers,1942) p.58]
Read these anti-male statements by notorious feminists
Under patriarchy, every woman’s son is her betrayer and also the inevitable rapist or exploiter of another woman.
- Andrea Dworkin
Men who are unjustly accused of rape can sometime gain from the experience. – Catherine Comins, Vassar College
To be male is to be a kind of idiot savant
- Germaine Greer
All men are rapists and that’s all they are
- Marilyn French
still,feminists say that”they are not doing anything harmful”.
it’s time to not to believe in feminism anymore.
“I believe that women have a capacity for understanding and compassion which a man structurally does not have, does not have it because he cannot have it. He’s just incapable of it.” – Former Congresswoman Barbara Jordan
“All men are rapists and that’s all they are” – Marilyn French, Author, “The Women’s Room”
“I feel that ‘man-hating’ is an honorable and viable political act, that the oppressed have a right to class-hatred against the class that is oppressing them.” – Robin Morgan, MS. Magazine Editor
“I claim that rape exists any time sexual intercourse occurs when it has not been initiated by the woman, out of her own genuine affection and desire.” – Robin Morgan
“And let’s put one lie to rest for all time: the lie that men are oppressed, too, by sexism–the lie that there can be such a thing as ‘men’s liberation groups.’ Oppression is something that one group of people commits against another group, specifically because of a ‘threatening’ characteristic shared by the latter group–skin color, sex or age, etc. The oppressors are indeed FUCKED UP by being masters, but those masters are not OPPRESSED. Any master has the alternative of divesting himself of sexism or racism–the oppressed have no alternative–for they have no power–but to fight. In the long run, Women’s Liberation will of course free men–but in the short run it’s going to cost men a lot of privilege, which no one gives up willingly or easily. Sexism is NOT the fault of women–kill your fathers, not your mothers.” – Robin Morgan
“My feelings about men are the result of my experience. I have little sympathy for them. Like a Jew just released from Dachau, I watch the handsome young Nazi soldier fall writhing to the ground with a bullet in his stomach and I look briefly and walk on. I don’t even need to shrug. I simply don’t care. What he was, as a person, I mean, what his shames and yearnings were, simply don’t matter.” – Marilyn French, in “The Women’s Room”
*MALE: … represents a variant of or deviation from the category of female. The first males were mutants… the male sex represents a degeneration and deformity of the female.’ *MAN: … an obsolete life form… an ordinary creature who needs to be watched … a contradictory baby-man … *TESTOSTERONE POISONING: … ‘Until now it has been though that the level of testosterone in men is normal simply because they have it. But if you consider how abnormal their behavior is, then you are led to the hypothesis that almost all men are suffering from “testosterone poisoning.”
“Who cares how men feel or what they do or whether they suffer? They have had over 2000 years to dominate and made a complete hash of it. Now it is our turn. My only comment to men is, if you don’t like it, bad luck — and if you get in my way I’ll run you down.” Signed: Liberated Woman, Boronia Herald-Sun, Melbourne, Australia – 9 February 1996
“No woman should be authorized to stay at home to raise her children. Society should be totally different. Women should not have that choice, precisely because if there is such a choice, too many women will make that one.” Simone de Beauvoir, author of _The Second Sex_, the book that is credited with launching the mainstream of the modern feminist movement —
Our demand is not for equality. Who wants to be like men! We are trying as women to define ourselves. We not only reject the definitions that men have given us, but reject becoming like men. –From WOMEN OF THE WORLD UNITE — WE HAVE NOTHING TO LOSE BUT OUR MEN! [In] Notes from the First Year. New York: The New York Radical Women, 1968. Renuka Chowdhary – a radical Indian feminist
“It is men’s turn to suffer” – Renuka Chowdhary on National television speaking about the Domestic Violence Act.
“It is not such a bad idea, except that I have such pity for men.” – Renuka Chowdhary when Karan Thapar (on a CNN-IBN interview) asked her if she thought that men should first suffer before she considers amendments to check misuse of the law.
http://www.ibnlive.com/news/act-wont-hit-good-hubbies-renuka/26051-3-6.html
“The male is a domestic animal which, if treated with firmness…can be trained to do most things.” – Jilly Cooper, SCUM (Society For Cutting Up Men, started by Valerie Solanas)
“To call a man an animal is to flatter him; he’s a machine, a walking dildo.” – Valerie Solanas, Authoress of the SCUM Manifesto Boys are immature, guys are jerks, men are rare.”
“No woman ever falls in love with a man unless she has a better opinion of him than he deserves.”
“A woman without a man is like a fish without a bicycle.” -Gloria Steinem
“The perfect man is like the Lochness Monster… they say he exists but no one’s ever seen him!”
“I think, therefore I am single.”
“Mr. Right’s coming.. but he’s in Africa and he’s walking!” -Oprah
August 24, 2010 at 9:44 pm
Desi Aadmi
Neo,
Highly appreciate your constructive criticism.
When I say women, I mean “Most of the women”.
But it cannot be denied that female politicians, from Margaret Thatcher to Indira gandhi, have been autocratic. You are in a bout of self-denial if you refuse to recognize this.
August 30, 2010 at 7:38 pm
Rohan
I guess when women are empowered, it gets into their head and they tend to misuse the power more than men. (most often)
In the past, women have been empowered at various times. Everytime they were empowered, they misused it. So then, the men disempowered them.
August 31, 2010 at 5:30 am
Neo
Well again generalisation and being extreme about a view makes us hate everyone. What I believe is there are few rats which are growing but on a whole is lot less than western contries. It would take (I believe) more than 5-10 years to really feel the pressure. What I want is before things get out of hand, we all men should spread awareness among ourselves about the change Indian women is going through. This will help us understand them better and then take measures which will not let go things out of hand. The most important man will be of “Fathers” responsibility. If he doesnt let things go out of proportion and inculcate ethical and moral teachings among the growing young girls then it would help enormously to this society. See there is no point in bashing women as a whole, cause targetting everyone will be like wasting of bullets with few rats getting affected. I see my father who has out of his ignorance and blind love for his child has developed a brutal feminist at my home. She, my sister, even though younger has little sense of politeness and always high on the education and the position she has got. Is this the reason they should study so that they forget what respect means. There are so many at offices playing bitch games and poor men still get used. Lets spread awareness to acheive a larger goal than bashing. The goal should be to identify bitches and isolate them. Make them aware that men are equally important. I dont belive that men are sheeps always slaughtered. What I mean is although men are dominant of the two and has really did all the bad things to the other sex, does not mean things can be generalised. There are problems at both ends, but women growing out of hate and morality in this new world are more dangerous to this society. Everything will crash and there will be no trust among both the sexes and then this world will implode within itself. Lets take lessons from west and try to implement in our day to day life. Let our children be as free and as educated they can be but the basics of morality, politeness and ethics should never ever be compromised. Else there will be caos everywhere like in west.
Also the statement that most women politicians were pshycopaths with a lot of bullshit in their heads can be tweaked as “Politicians will be politicians, men or women….just that women are still learning on how to handle power and most of the time they misuse it”
September 7, 2010 at 12:59 am
10stds
Desi Aadmi, may I ask what is wrong with being “autocratic” as a political leader? It can wrong to the advantage of the nation and it’s citizens. People are criticising Obama right not for not being autocratic enough.
September 7, 2010 at 1:00 am
10stds
Edit to the above: “it can WORK to the advantage of the nation….”